8 to 6 on a 9' table vs. on a 7' table

BillPorter

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
187
From
Cincinnati, OH
I play a guy who gives me 8 to 6. We have about broken even after playing many sessions this way. We always play on a 9' Diamond table. Today they were recovering the 9' tables at the pool hall and my opponent asked if I wanted to play on one of the 7' tables. Since he plays on 7' tables a lot and I never play on them, I figured he would have the best of it on the smaller table, but I agree to play not wanting to go back home without any action.

I am looking for opinions from you One Hole gurus as to whether, every thing else being equal, getting 8 to 6 on a 7' table is about the same game as 8 to 6 on a 9' table. By the way, my opponent and I are both in our 70s.

Thanks in advance for your comments. :)
 

straightback

Verified Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2014
Messages
1,851
From
owensboro, ky
I play a guy who gives me 8 to 6. We have about broken even after playing many sessions this way. We always play on a 9' Diamond table. Today they were recovering the 9' tables at the pool hall and my opponent asked if I wanted to play on one of the 7' tables. Since he plays on 7' tables a lot and I never play on them, I figured he would have the best of it on the smaller table, but I agree to play not wanting to go back home without any action.

I am looking for opinions from you One Hole gurus as to whether, every thing else being equal, getting 8 to 6 on a 7' table is about the same game as 8 to 6 on a 9' table. By the way, my opponent and I are both in our 70s.

Thanks in advance for your comments. :)

Additionally, I would be curious to hear how the game is different on a little table. About the only thing I know is that folks sometimes hit the head ball full in the face on the break and try to stick it there.
 

Renegade_56

Verified Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
383
Seems to me the advantage would lean to the better player, since there is much less real estate, therefore placing more premium on cueball control, which you would assume the better player, is better at.
 

petie

Verified Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
3,314
From
Citrus Springs, FL
Long ago I noticed playing 9 ball that bar boxes made it a much less predictable situation. EVERYBODY shoots straight on a bar box. World class 9 ball on a 9 footer is 10 racks in a row. On a bar box its over 20 racks in a row. Bar boxes will bring out the champion in you (which will scare the champion out of your opponent.) I think you crushed the guy.
 

androd

Verified Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
7,719
From
New Braunfels tx.
It's much easier to play position on a 9ft. More crowded on an 8ft.
7ft might be a traffic jam.
Rod.
P.s. Less runs may favor guy going to 6. ?
 

BillPorter

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
187
From
Cincinnati, OH
Long ago I noticed playing 9 ball that bar boxes made it a much less predictable situation. EVERYBODY shoots straight on a bar box. World class 9 ball on a 9 footer is 10 racks in a row. On a bar box its over 20 racks in a row. Bar boxes will bring out the champion in you (which will scare the champion out of your opponent.) I think you crushed the guy.

We only played five games, but I won all five and he unscrewed his cue. It is rare if ever that I win 4-5 in a row on a nine footer. The shots looked so much easier to me, I never had to use a bridge, and it was pretty easy to block his banking lanes. Bank is his best game and he some times kills me when he's in the zone with his banks. Over all, I found it easier to play him safe.
 

BillPorter

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
187
From
Cincinnati, OH
It's much easier to play position on a 9ft. More crowded on an 8ft.
7ft might be a traffic jam.
Rod.
P.s. Less runs may favor guy going to 6. ?
I think you're right. He didn't seem to be able to run balls as well as he does on a nine footer while I was a bit more able to run my usual 2-3 balls.
 

petie

Verified Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
3,314
From
Citrus Springs, FL
We only played five games, but I won all five and he unscrewed his cue. It is rare if ever that I win 4-5 in a row on a nine footer. The shots looked so much easier to me, I never had to use a bridge, and it was pretty easy to block his banking lanes. Bank is his best game and he some times kills me when he's in the zone with his banks. Over all, I found it easier to play him safe.

I think one naturally stands up a little straighter or gets his chin a little higher on a small table. I think this is generally good for you.
 

Frank Almanza

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
2,569
From
Upland, California
If I'm the better player and giving up weight I would prefer to play on the bigger table. The main difference I have found is that the banks are too easy even for the lesser player. They will shoot and make too many of them where on the big table they would normally shy away from them if there is a chance of missing and giving the game away.
 

Frank Almanza

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
2,569
From
Upland, California
If I'm the better player and giving up weight I would prefer to play on the bigger table. The main difference I have found is that the banks are too easy even for the lesser player. They will shoot and make too many of them where on the big table they would normally shy away from them if there is a chance of missing and giving the game away.

I'm just a so-so banker normally, but I becomes a Brumback on the bar table.
 

BillPorter

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
187
From
Cincinnati, OH
I'm just a so-so banker normally, but I becomes a Brumback on the bar table.
I'm no Brumback on the little table, but I did find that the bank shots looked a lot easier. By the way, the next time I played this opponent, he wouldn't play on the 7' table. We broke even playing 8 to 6 on our regular 9' Diamond table.
 
Top