Go Back   OnePocket.org Forums > One Pocket Forum
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:21 PM
darmoose darmoose is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,392
Default

I think this only serves to complicate and further lengthen the game of one pocket.

My first preference is to get rid of this obsession to "rack your own", which is how all this discussion came up in the first place. Seems to me this is a recent development that started with 9 ball rack mechanics. I see nothing wrong with having the opponent rack the balls for the breaker, and the breaker certainly has the right to inspect the rack. I have seen people argue over this though, claiming the racker just can't get the rack right. If that were so, how you gonna let him rack his own?

If we got to go with the "rack your own" obsessors, then I prefer that if you make a ball on the break you spot it and sit down. Nothing could be simpler, more fair to both players, and faster.
__________________
The early bird may get the worm...but the second mouse gets the cheese...Shutin@urholeisOVERATED.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:23 PM
darmoose darmoose is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,392
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy B View Post
Why not break and sit down, no matter what happens, then your opponent shoots..
I agree with this too, Jimmy B.
__________________
The early bird may get the worm...but the second mouse gets the cheese...Shutin@urholeisOVERATED.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:31 PM
Jakie Jakie is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Naples Fl
Posts: 175
Default Ball on the break

Let me start by saying that I totally disagree with the re-rack rule. To me, it goes completely against the grain of all other pocket billiards games. Even straight pool, whose rules are used in the game of one pocket, allows the breaker to continue his inning after a called/made ball.

Although it seems a majority of players now favor the re-rack,I feel negating a good break is a stiff penalty for making a good shot. Especially if you scratch or leak the corner ball on the second break.[big swing there]. My proposal to make this situation less penal to the breaker would be:

1. Spot the made ball

2. After the made ball is spotted the breaker has the option to re-break or keep the first break as it lies and your opponent shoots from there.

It seems that most breaks where a ball is made are usually very good breaks so the breaker would not be so severely penalized.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:39 PM
Mkbtank's Avatar
Mkbtank Mkbtank is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Philly Pa
Posts: 5,126
Default A Ball on the break proposal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakie View Post
Let me start by saying that I totally disagree with the re-rack rule. To me, it goes completely against the grain of all other pocket billiards games. Even straight pool, whose rules are used in the game of one pocket, allows the breaker to continue his inning after a called/made ball.



Although it seems a majority of players now favor the re-rack,I feel negating a good break is a stiff penalty for making a good shot. Especially if you scratch or leak the corner ball on the second break.[big swing there]. My proposal to make this situation less penal to the breaker would be:



1. Spot the made ball



2. After the made ball is spotted the breaker has the option to re-break or keep the first break as it lies and your opponent shoots from there.



It seems that most breaks where a ball is made are usually very good breaks so the breaker would not be so severely penalized.


Thatís a good idea Nick 👍
__________________
Mitch needs to remember to play the score and that it's better to win than to look like a hero.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:47 PM
LSJohn LSJohn is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: monett missouri
Posts: 7,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sappo View Post

Expanding on Tres' rule I would like to see the breaker have the option of a 3rd break if he sells out that ball. Its the only truly fair solution if your are going the rerack if the breaker makes a ball.
That's a step in the right direction, Keith, but now we're getting even deeper into time issues. I think a much simpler solution is for the breaker to break and sit down whatever happens. If he makes a ball he keeps it, if he scratches or sells out, he pays, but no matter what, it's opponent's turn at the table.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-17-2019, 06:54 PM
LSJohn LSJohn is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: monett missouri
Posts: 7,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darmoose View Post
you spot it and sit down.
The only thing I don't like about spotting it is that since it doesn't go on the spot, it will sometimes go someplace in the back where it's shootable or bankable for the opponent, who might not have had a shot otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-17-2019, 07:08 PM
sappo's Avatar
sappo sappo is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,050
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LSJohn View Post
That's a step in the right direction, Keith, but now we're getting even deeper into time issues. I think a much simpler solution is for the breaker to break and sit down whatever happens. If he makes a ball he keeps it, if he scratches or sells out, he pays, but no matter what, it's opponent's turn at the table.
I too feel the best solution is if you make the ball it stays down and the breaker continues shooting. If racking for your opponent solves this problem then that is a great solution. But my secondary recommendation would not take up enough extra time that the match would be delayed. Hell stop smoke breaks and you would save enough time to repack one rebreak a dozen times.

Time should not be the issue here, fair play for both players is the issue as I see it. K
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-17-2019, 07:50 PM
lll lll is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: vero beach fl
Posts: 14,498
Default

my 2 cents (worth less...)
having your opponent rack
with you inspecting the rack
eliminates all this nonsense
jmho
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-17-2019, 07:57 PM
lll lll is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: vero beach fl
Posts: 14,498
Default

more 2 cents
if we are going to let the breaker have a 3rd break
if he makes one
then scratches
then we need to make THIS rule official
that if you make a ball and scratch
THE BALL GETS SPOTTED
YOU OWE ONE
AND YOU OPPONENT HAS BALL IN HAND BEHIND THE HEAD STRING
how can we let someone break again if they scratch on the break ?????

jmho
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-17-2019, 08:00 PM
Billy Jackets Billy Jackets is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Wirth View Post
In watching yesterday's match between Scott Frost and Danny Smith I heard an interesting idea when it came to a player who makes
a ball on the break and the re-rack rule is in force. Did any of you catch this?

I don't know if this rule was implemented in this match but here is what was at least suggested:

Rack your own and if you make a ball on the break it calls for a re-rack.
Now here was the interesting part. Should you scratch on your follow-up break you can then have a third and deciding re-rack and break.

I think this is only fair considering how on the first break you would be in such a commanding position
and with having scratched on your second attempt you are now in deep guano. Seems like the two
breaks cancel one another out.
It will not happen often but it will happen.

What does the OP.org public think of this idea?
I suggest we include this rule in our OP.org tournaments.
This inquiring mind wants the know.

Tom
I think it's the only fair thing to do , all the "fast" fast, faster, people will want to say no.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content Copyright Onepocket.org and/or the original author. All rights reserved.