newfosgatesucks said:
I tend to agree with a lot of your views,! especially this one.
WHen I play sub-par I tend to do things differently, and then IT shows up!!! Usually I get a little hot about how I couldn't have been beat any other way, and it makes me play better. That is why I do not perform well playing 'friendly' as I do playing to kill.
"IT" showed up for about 15 minutes at the nine ball tournament last night. It got me hot enough to win.
I would like too clariefy Something. The pool player who shoots hard shots and gambles can get lucky or unlucky.
A person who playes the game correctly its hard for him too get lucky or unlucky.
Because the shots he shoots are calculated and everything is figuerd out ahead off time.
And he is looking too do a specific thing on every shot. And that eliminates almost all the luck factor playing one pocket.
Because he doesnt shoot real haed shots or takes big gambles. Were you can get trapet. He tryies too eliminate the luck factor.
And thats were luck and mistakes come into play. So realy the luck will be hard too even out If one person is calculating every shot.
Compaired too a agressive shooter Like Ronnie Bugs Scott Corn Bread REd Jersy Red. Thier will be key luck factore involved.
Because off their agressive shots and moves.
If you are betting on a game now it can play a big part in winning and loosing.
And some times even the best off every bet can put you on a loosing streack.
Luck playes a big part because if it comes to guessing and picking. And Horses it will show up big time.
But in a onepocket game the person who shoots hard shots and moves will have the big luck factor swings. Wheather he gets lucky or unlucky.
But a real one pocket player will not have this happen much. Because off the way he plays the game. So I dont think it could even out between the two players.
Because one player shoots lucky shots. And thee other players does not.
And if the one player gets real lucky he should win. Umless he has a real bad game. Then he will loose no matter how lucky he gets.
And people talk about integraty. Were is it when you make a game the other player cannot win.
And If all those people you beat. Mr Billy Stroud you would call a fould on yourself.
What about the people who you beat who had no chance. Were is the integraty.
I will show you I will call a foul on myself but I still have a game were the other player cant win. Witch is worse for Integraty.
Playing someone who cant win. Or playing a sleeper that the player didnt see. I dont think you can call that integraty.
Unless you think it could be a hipacrite.