Go Back   OnePocket.org Forums > One Pocket Forum
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2019, 12:28 PM
sneakynito's Avatar
sneakynito sneakynito is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 435
Default best format for these big matches

What's your guys' opinion on this 10/20/30/40 format now that we've seen it a few times?

I think it's a pretty brutal one mentally and physically if you get behind.
If you don't recover strong and quick, every subsequent day the road is longer and steeper. I guess that's the point, I just wonder if it does it too effectively.
I don't think I actually recall a match in this format where the leader switched any subsequent day. I know that the loser has definitely been able to win more games for a day, but i don't remember a loser actually coming back and hitting the day's milestone first. My memory sucks, though.

Tony did claw back tooth and nail, but even day 2 and 3, when the day counts for the day were very close at times,Tony just looked like he was having to work so much harder.

I wonder what's tougher, going into day 4 knowing you need to win 15 games to Dennis' 10, or if Dennis was up 6 or 7 games in an 8 ahead match?

So what's the best format for showing who is the better player?

Ahead matches? Straight race with time cutoff per day? This 10/20/30/40 format?

I doubt there's a right answer. And "better player" is subjective. Dealing with the mental aspect of playing from behind is a hallmark of any great player.
Just curious for your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2019, 02:11 PM
vapros vapros is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: baton rouge, la
Posts: 3,269
Default

Finding the better player is important. But if you are the promoter or the streamer it's even more important to be sure they will play for four days, as advertised.
__________________
If it ain't funny, it ain't much.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2019, 04:20 PM
wincardona wincardona is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dallas Tx.
Posts: 7,264
Default

A race to 40 is IMO a very boring format, there are very few moments of sitting at the edge of your chair pulling for your favorite player. How do we fix this? Mulitiple shorter races would be my suggestion. The shorter the race the more exciting it will be, plus with short races a player will never face a situation like Tony did against Dennis being down 10 games in a race to 40. That's demoralizing in itself, no wonder Tony looked exhausted he was constantly looking at an uphill battle.

Lets say the format is best of 21 sets first player to win eleven sets wins, races to three would be fair. In a race to three there will be at least 75% of sets going hill hill. Now that's excitement. How would that determine who the best player is? The best player should win regardless of the format, but what you don't want to happen is to bore people with the format. In a race to three how many times did Reyes win the Derby City One Pocket Championship? Well I guess that's proof that in a race to three the best players still have the edge.

Another factor that is inspiring is that the player that falls behind will be able to keep a fairly high confidence level because leads are more easily surmounted in races to three.

That would be my suggestion on the format.

Dr. Bill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2019, 05:11 PM
youngstownkid's Avatar
youngstownkid youngstownkid is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,437
Default best format for these big matches

I agree finding the better player is actually probably less important than finding the best production value. What’s best for the fans?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:37 PM
lll lll is online now
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: vero beach fl
Posts: 14,552
Default

in tennis the grand slams for the men are best of 5 (first to win 3 sets)
wins
races to X(pick your number) 3 out of 5 would be exciting because even if the player got killed one day its only 1 set
i like this as a race to 10 each day lets say
it gives the better player an edge compared to a race to 3
jmho
icbw
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2019, 09:58 PM
crabbcatjohn crabbcatjohn is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Benton, Ky.
Posts: 2,533
Default

I watch quite a few streams. I agree the race to 40 format isn't ideal for viewers. I would prefer single races to 10 per day. Something like ..
10k per set each day with 3 sets guaranteed. Of course the guy that is stealing would prefer the one long race... lol as fans we get to see 3 sets...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2019, 10:24 PM
LSJohn LSJohn is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: monett missouri
Posts: 7,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wincardona View Post
A race to 40 is IMO a very boring format, there are very few moments of sitting at the edge of your chair pulling for your favorite player. How do we fix this? Mulitiple shorter races would be my suggestion. The shorter the race the more exciting it will be, plus with short races a player will never face a situation like Tony did against Dennis being down 10 games in a race to 40. That's demoralizing in itself, no wonder Tony looked exhausted he was constantly looking at an uphill battle.

Lets say the format is best of 21 sets first player to win eleven sets wins, races to three would be fair. In a race to three there will be at least 75% of sets going hill hill. Now that's excitement. How would that determine who the best player is? The best player should win regardless of the format, but what you don't want to happen is to bore people with the format. In a race to three how many times did Reyes win the Derby City One Pocket Championship? Well I guess that's proof that in a race to three the best players still have the edge.

Another factor that is inspiring is that the player that falls behind will be able to keep a fairly high confidence level because leads are more easily surmounted in races to three.

That would be my suggestion on the format.

Dr. Bill
Good call, Bill. I'm with you.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2019, 10:31 PM
catkins's Avatar
catkins catkins is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: oakland california
Posts: 439
Default

how good an event would be a tennis style one pocket tourney best of three sets to advance with maybe 8 person tourney over a week( win by two with a tie breaker of course)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2019, 10:45 PM
Terry Hanna's Avatar
Terry Hanna Terry Hanna is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Las Vegas Nevada
Posts: 950
Default

Ray did his best to talk Tony into playing races to 10 best out of 5 sets. Way better format IMO

Multiple best of sets much more exciting for the sweaters and side bettors each day has a fresh start.

That's the format Billy and Efren played few months ago and that match was much more exciting IMO

Tony insisted on a race to 40

I do like the idea of even more shorter races, like Billy was talking about. Races to 5 best 6 out 10 maybe

Last edited by Terry Hanna; 09-24-2019 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2019, 11:01 PM
youngstownkid's Avatar
youngstownkid youngstownkid is offline
Verified Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,437
Default best format for these big matches

What about race to 10 for 10k each day guaranteed 4 days, instead of race to 40 for 40k...then viewers know what they’re getting, or a progressive bet, like first day bet X amount, second day bet is doubled (2X), third day is tripled (3X), final day is quadrupled (4x)...the progressive bet would be interesting IMO...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All original content Copyright Onepocket.org and/or the original author. All rights reserved.