Yeah, that is a real nice tribute. However I could not help but notice how many of the photos were either mine or Diana Hoppe's, and not to pour cold water or anything, I know I was not asked, and I also don't see a single photo credit. I just don't understand that kind of thing... but they did do a nice job otherwise.
I know there are other memorial slide shows for Grady too. I am pretty sure Calired did one, but I can't seem to find it at the moment. But while I was looking, I found this one, which must have been done by someone pretty close to the family because it includes a bunch of childhood and family photos that I had never seen. The technical artistry of this slideshow is not quite as refined as the one JAM found, but I think if you are a Grady fan you will enjoy this one too:
http://youtu.be/Ywu7uGU_K0s
I had not seen that one before. The silence, or no music, adds to the effect of the tribute, I think.
About proprietary photos on the Internet, I see my photos online all the time, without any mention of me taking the photo, but I'm not a professional photographer, so it doesn't bother me too much. In fact, my photo of Kevin Trudeau has really made the rounds on national media sources.
When I was active on Wikipedia for the cue sports section, Diana asked if I could create an Wiki article about Danny DiLiberto, and she sent me some photos for the article. I explained to her the STRICT rules of photographs on Wikipedia about permission guidelines. I don't think Diana understood.
About a year later, after I created the article, I got an e-mail from Wikipedia editors stating that Diana had complained about the Danny DiLiberto photos without her name in print underneath them. Again, at the time Diana gave me the photos to post in the article, I explained to her the problems of attribution and credits for photos on Wikipedia.
Today, the rules about photos on Wikipedia are more easier to understand, but back in the day when I was trying to create the article with the photographs Diana gave to me, I could not post her name as the person who took the photo, because at that time Wikipedia considered it as advertising. The photos were removed by Wikipedia editors because Diana complained. These were the photos she asked me to insert in Danny's article, which I did. Again, I explained to Diana the problems with Wikipedia and photos at that time. I don't think Diana meant to have them removed, but she did want her name in print underneath the photo. You can't do that on Wikipedia.