odds on the money per ball as a spot

lll

Verified Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
19,102
From
vero beach fl
the game is you play each game until all balls are made
and count your score
the stronger players balls count x dollars per ball
the weaker players ball count some percentage of x per ball
example
strong player gives weaker player 2:1 per ball at $20 per ball
end of first rack
strong player makes 10 balls =$200 (10x20)
weak player makes 5 balls =$200 (5x $40)
so they break even
for you guys that like percentages
how can you calculate based on how you play someone by ball count to odds on the cost of each ball
for example
if you can give someone 10-8 what odds on the money per ball could you give
 

wincardona

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
7,693
From
Dallas Tx.
the game is you play each game until all balls are made
and count your score
the stronger players balls count x dollars per ball
the weaker players ball count some percentage of x per ball
example
strong player gives weaker player 2:1 per ball at $20 per ball
end of first rack
strong player makes 10 balls =$200 (10x20)
weak player makes 5 balls =$200 (5x $40)
so they break even
for you guys that like percentages
how can you calculate based on how you play someone by ball count to odds on the cost of each ball
for example
if you can give someone 10-8 what odds on the money per ball could you give
Larry, I think there was a thread that addressed that proposition, i'm sure Rodney or someone else can direct you to it.

Lets look at it this way..When playing this prop by placing a value on each ball the way you could accurately determine what the correct value is would be to play the entire rack out with your opponent a number of times. Say you play five racks out completely for a total of 75 balls. Then you would take the number of balls the better player makes and divide by the number of balls that the lesser player made to get a ball value.

Example; In five racks the better player made 45 of the 75 balls and the weaker player made 30 of the 75 balls. You would take the number of balls the better player made which would be 45 and divide it by the number of balls the lesser player made which would be 30. 45 divided by 30 would give you a 1.5 to 1.0 value. 3/2. Which is $1.50 to $1.00

That would be an accurate way to determine what the ball value would be between two players playing out the entire rack (15 balls) Playing out the entire rack places importance on all areas of the game, an ecellent way of playing to pick up on experience playing all parts of the game. However, playing the score now becomes a moot point, this way of playing puts more emphasis on the "risk against reward" value when choosing options. Very interesting.

Dr. Bill
 

LSJohn

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
8,530
From
monett missouri
Larry, I think there was a thread that addressed that proposition, i'm sure Rodney or someone else can direct you to it.

Lets look at it this way..When playing this prop by placing a value on each ball the way you could accurately determine what the correct value is would be to play the entire rack out with your opponent a number of times. Say you play five racks out completely for a total of 75 balls. Then you would take the number of balls the better player makes and divide by the number of balls that the lesser player made to get a ball value.

Example; In five racks the better player made 45 of the 75 balls and the weaker player made 30 of the 75 balls. You would take the number of balls the better player made which would be 45 and divide it by the number of balls the lesser player made which would be 30. 45 divided by 30 would give you a 1.5 to 1.0 value. 3/2. Which is $1.50 to $1.00

That would be an accurate way to determine what the ball value would be between two players playing out the entire rack (15 balls) Playing out the entire rack places importance on all areas of the game, an ecellent way of playing to pick up on experience playing all parts of the game. However, playing the score now becomes a moot point, this way of playing puts more emphasis on the "risk against reward" value when choosing options. Very interesting.

Dr. Bill

That's the best way, but unlikely to ever be available in the real world. Two guys who want to gamble a fair match against each other aren't likely to play five or ten racks for ice water to find out what's fair, and even if they do, which -- if not both -- are on the lemon? :heh

I think Larry wants to know how to figure out what would be the money-odds equivalent to 10-8 or 9-6 as a pure mathematical question rather than as a real-time test.

IMO, if 10-8 is even, $10 for the weaker player and $8 for the stronger (or $5-$4 or $1.00-$.80) would be close, but would give the better player a small edge from the fact that games will last longer. $9-$6 same way.
 

wincardona

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
7,693
From
Dallas Tx.
That's the best way, but unlikely to ever be available in the real world. Two guys who want to gamble a fair match against each other aren't likely to play five or ten racks for ice water to find out what's fair, and even if they do, which -- if not both -- are on the lemon? :heh

I think Larry wants to know how to figure out what would be the money-odds equivalent to 10-8 or 9-6 as a pure mathematical question rather than as a real-time test.

IMO, if 10-8 is even, $10 for the weaker player and $8 for the stronger (or $5-$4 or $1.00-$.80) would be close, but would give the better player a small edge from the fact that games will last longer. $9-$6 same way.

John, I understand that no one is going to practice playing 5 racks of one pocket all the way through to determine what game would be fare, in terms of applying a money line attached to the ball count but you could start out playing cheap and make the necessary adjustments if you need to as you are playing. Adjustments with the bet or the money line, either way it stimulates action.

Furthermore, if you are familiar with one another's game and have a history with playing one another than based of of the formula I proposed then you can ust that as a way to start the negotiations. 10/8 = $1.25 where 9/6= $1.50. Woudn't that be a good way to start the negotiation from?

Dr. Bill
 

LSJohn

Verified Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
8,530
From
monett missouri
John, I understand that no one is going to practice playing 5 racks of one pocket all the way through to determine what game would be fare, in terms of applying a money line attached to the ball count but you could start out playing cheap and make the necessary adjustments if you need to as you are playing. Adjustments with the bet or the money line, either way it stimulates action.

Furthermore, if you are familiar with one another's game and have a history with playing one another than based of of the formula I proposed then you can ust that as a way to start the negotiations. 10/8 = $1.25 where 9/6= $1.50. Woudn't that be a good way to start the negotiation from?

Dr. Bill

Yeah, that would have to be awfully close, keeping in mind the slight advantage to the stronger player (if 10-8, 9-6 were right in the first place.) I have no problem with that... I think the better player deserves a little advantage.
 

BRLongArm

Verified Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2006
Messages
1,886
Before I get started, let me say that these are approximate money lines for an 8-8 even game. Whether they are accurate or merely a starting point on a consensus money line is an open question. Having said that, and without having tried out these money lines to determine whether they are as fair as they look, here they are:

Differences in skill level and by game money line needed to play even:

9-8: +105
8-7: +110
10-8: +115
9-7, 10-8: +125
9-7: +130
8-6: +135
10-7: +140
11-7: +150
9-6: +160
10-6: +180
11-6: +200
12-6: +220
9-5: +240
10-5: +260
11-5: +280
12-5: +300
 
Top