my prblem with that if the solid doesnt go (and i assume it doesnt cause its too obviuos so i'll post my other idea next)wgcp said:I would have to bank the two into the 14 and 4 using the 10 as a stopper...
lll said:to me the obvious shot if the 4 (solid ball by buddys pocket) goes is this
playing to bank the 2 next
lll said:dick since you are up early
good morning
would you comment on my shot if the combo cant go
Buddy looked at that shot and Cardone liked it a lot but Buddy passed it up.Frank Almanza said:I like doing this to present a threat of some sort. Taking balls away from his pocket is without opening these two balls leaves him many options for offensive. With these balls tied up and you leave a bank you could be in more trouble. View attachment 1895
Cowboy Dennis said:Buddy opted to attempt the bank on the 2 ball. Cardone warned of the double-kiss and said the shot was too risky but Buddy didn't listen the doctor . Result: Double-kiss, the cueball never even hit the rail.
View attachment 1897
View attachment 1898
What eas the score before they started. And If the tread bothers you thier are 20 other ones you can post on.Skin said:Alright. STOP!
Before the game started, what was the computed Jeremy ball value of Buddy double-kissing a cross-corner bank to his hole? __________
Now, roll the tape, please...
Skin
Artie Bodendorfer said:What eas the score before they started. And If the tread bothers you thier are 20 other ones you can post on.
And you can even start your own tread. You have that wright. And unless you can give the correct answer.
Then you need too waite tell the correct answer comes up. Or swet another post.
You are not obligated too read or answer too this post.
You have no commitment to reply. And you are not in a court off law.
Ok no problem. I just took it the wrong way. But if you have a probability expert he can call someone else that you no.Skin said:Look Artie, I didn't pull your string on this thread. I was just making a joke to razz Dennis, who started it, a bit.
On the other thread, however, I posted what a statistics professor (what the heck do you think that is except a "probability expert"?) had to say about the spot and, among other arrogant things, you said in your reply to have him call you so you could explain it to him. That is why I did not respond to you. Becausee I don't want an unpleasant exchange of words.
I believe your argument about the spot is with other people. I am just trying to pester Dennis in a good natured way right now on this completely separate thread.
Skin
Artie Bodendorfer said:Ok no problem. I just took it the wrong way. But if you have a probability expert he can call someone else that you no.
And I will explain the qouietion to them. And they can explain it to the math expert.
But I have talked too math experts and I had probabilitiy Qouistions and the had no way off how to figure them out . Or how to even get a answer.
Thier are lots off math majors and math experts. But probabilities is a different thing all to gether.
And If you like I will give you the qouistion and see what answer he gives you. It doesnt get any fairer then that.
If the game is 18 to 4 breack apeace. Forget about the free scratch free push or the free foul.Skin said:Alright, Artie. Shoot. Give me the question and I will ask him in exactly the words you write. When I get the answer I will post it on here in exactly the words he says.
What are the odds on it not being "WTFA!"? Just kidding...
Skin