wincardona
Verified Member
fine line
fine line
the tougher the table usually favors the player receiving the spot, but doesn't have to favor the mover against the shooter when there is no spot involved. If you were to play on the toughest tables in the world against a straight shooter, say like Parica, you would have a tougher game beating him because he shoots too straight,and he does understand the game. But if you put him on a table where you will get paid for your superior moving ability, then you have a bigger edge. So I guess theres a fine line there that's worthy of discussion.
fine line
wincardona said:Your reasoning applies to getting spotted, of coarse it's tougher to win spotting another player on a 5x10, but we are talking about two players playing even. You think that the mover will be shooting easier shots than a shooter, I agree, but on a 4-1/2 x 9 the mover will put the shooter in more traps where there is very little chance to escape, opposed to the bigger table. Now you could be right when you say that a mover has a better game on a 5x10 but that's based on your experiences playing your style,not to many if any can play your style. Personally I think it's closer than you think. But if I was to be getting spotted I would rather play on a 5x10, or for that matter on a snooker table.
the tougher the table usually favors the player receiving the spot, but doesn't have to favor the mover against the shooter when there is no spot involved. If you were to play on the toughest tables in the world against a straight shooter, say like Parica, you would have a tougher game beating him because he shoots too straight,and he does understand the game. But if you put him on a table where you will get paid for your superior moving ability, then you have a bigger edge. So I guess theres a fine line there that's worthy of discussion.
Last edited: