twister
Verified Member
I was watching a Parica/Bugs one pocket match and it's the first game of the match and Parica leaves Bugs on the 'correct' side of the stack so Bugs can't shoot directly towards his hole. But he doesn't leave Bugs frozen to the stack and the ball closest to the cue ball (maybe an inch or two away) will bank in Bugs hole. Bugs being Bugs of course decides to bank the ball in his hole. While he does make the bank, he clearly and unambiguously fouls while doing so and you can see the cue ball scoot forward after Bugs double hits it.
So, my question is would you have called a foul in this case? Or is it a lost cause because Parica didn't call the TD over to watch the hit beforehand? If I'm playing a weaker opponent and I'm pretty confident I can win, I usually let something like this slide, but against a stronger player, leaving them close to the balls is supposed to negate their ability to do something like Bugs did, so there should be more incentive to make the correct call. These double hit fouls come up a lot when the cue ball is very close but not frozen to the object ball, so I'm looking forward to all your thoughts and experiences.
So, my question is would you have called a foul in this case? Or is it a lost cause because Parica didn't call the TD over to watch the hit beforehand? If I'm playing a weaker opponent and I'm pretty confident I can win, I usually let something like this slide, but against a stronger player, leaving them close to the balls is supposed to negate their ability to do something like Bugs did, so there should be more incentive to make the correct call. These double hit fouls come up a lot when the cue ball is very close but not frozen to the object ball, so I'm looking forward to all your thoughts and experiences.